◈

Professional Services & HR · Australia (Perth)

Adapt hiring and contracts to shifting talent and AI signals

Published May 4, 2026, 6:10 AM AWST•APAC•Full category signal
Ask AI
Accounting firms advised to look beyond traditional talent for new hires

In 60 seconds

Top move

Accounting firms in Australia are widening hiring pools beyond traditional accounting degrees — this changes sourcing strategies and reduces sole reliance on offshore labour as the only supply lever

Key takeaways

  • Accounting firms in Australia are widening hiring pools beyond traditional accounting degrees — this changes sourcing strategies and reduces sole reliance on offshore labour as the only supply lever.[1]
  • Vendors and platforms are accelerating AI partnerships and feature rollouts, increasing dependency on supplier-provided audit trails and platform governance that buyers should contractually require.[3]
  • Pre-budget commentary from treasury is raising uncertainty about tax policy direction; buyers of payroll and tax advisory should expect possible shifts in advisory demand and compliance scope.[2]
  • For procurement, the combined signals mean negotiate for clearer SOWs on verification, staffing location (onshore/offshore), and change-order mechanics rather than assuming stable supplier pricing or availability.[1]
  • Talent moves (non-traditional hires) are operationally real but partial: some firms are experimenting with the approach while others still rely on legacy pipelines — validate supplier readiness case-by-case.[1]

What changed since last run

  • New, observable supplier behaviour: accounting firms actively recruiting non-accounting talent as a deliberate sourcing alternative rather than only offshoring (Article 3).
  • Stronger market signal on vendor-level AI activity: public reports of platform partnerships and faster AI feature adoption reinforce the need for supplier audit-trail and governance clauses (Article 4).

Key facts

  • Treasury media appearances ahead of the budget
  • Public statements emphasising intergenerational fairness without detailed policy changes
  • Recruitment of non-accounting candidates for junior/intermediate roles
  • Reported employer emphasis on trainability and emotional intelligence
  • Reported acceleration of AI features and vendor partnerships
  • Industry commentary that governance frameworks lag feature rollouts

Why it matters

Accounting firms in Australia are widening hiring pools beyond traditional accounting degrees — this changes sourcing strategies and reduces sole reliance on offshore labour as the only supply lever. Vendors and platforms are accelerating AI partnerships and feature rollouts, increasing dependency on supplier-provided audit trails and platform governance that buyers should contractually require. Pre-budget commentary from treasury is raising uncertainty about tax policy direction; buyers of payroll and tax advisory should expect possible shifts in advisory demand and compliance scope. For procurement, the combined signals mean negotiate for clearer SOWs on verification, staffing location (onshore/offshore), and change-order mechanics rather than assuming stable supplier pricing or availability

Cost / money

  • Broadening hiring pools can reduce immediate competition for trained accountants and lower premium rates for scarce senior hires, but may increase training and verification costs for buyers.[1]
  • Faster AI feature rollout from vendors can shift verification and remediation costs back to buyers unless contracts specify supplier obligations for auditability and error remediation.[3]

Supplier / commercial

  • Suppliers that offer onshore staffing or reskilling pathways may use that as a differentiator and justify higher per-engagement pricing for guaranteed local delivery.[1]
  • Platform and software partners pursuing joint AI features create new single-vendor dependencies; negotiating multi-supplier exit or data-portability terms becomes commercially important.[3]
  • Pre-budget uncertainty could cause advisory suppliers to delay fixed-fee bidding or to propose narrower scopes with higher contingency clauses for tax work.[2]

Safety / operations

  • Bringing non-accounting hires into finance roles increases the need for documented supervision, verified audit trails, and focused training to avoid payroll or compliance errors.[1][3]
  • Greater reliance on vendor AI features heightens operational cyber and data integrity exposure unless SLAs and incident response obligations are explicit in contracts.[3]

What to watch

  • Watch for supplier RFP/SOW redlines that narrow liability, add pass-through remediation fees, or require buyer-side verification — these are early indicators suppliers are shifting cost and risk.[3]

Top stories

Story 1Accountantsdaily•May 3, 2026

Tax takeaways from Chalmers’ pre-budget interview blitz

Signal limitedDirectional
Source notes [2]Read source

What happened

Treasury commentary in the pre-budget media run is signalling priorities but remains non-specific on major tax changes. The public remarks shut down some speculation but leave advisers and payroll buyers uncertain about upcoming compliance demands. Watch for formal budget measures that could trigger a surge in advisory or remediation requests

Buyer takeaway

Treat pre-budget commentary as a demand-uncertainty signal that pushes suppliers to tighten scopes and add contingencies

Cost / money

Suppliers may seek higher per-engagement fees or contingency lines for tax/payroll work given the uncertain policy outcome

Supplier / commercial

Expect narrower bids and change-order language; suppliers could delay fixed-price offers until budget clarity

Safety / operations

Potential for last-minute advisory or remediation work that strains payroll and tax processing unless fallbacks are validated

What to watch

Watch for suppliers adding escape clauses or pass-through pricing tied to regulatory change

Key facts

  • Treasury media appearances ahead of the budget
  • Public statements emphasising intergenerational fairness without detailed policy changes

Source excerpts

In a recent media blitz, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has emphasised intergenerational fairness as a key priority in any tax measures to be imposed in this year’s budget. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has been on a media blitz ahead of the 12 May budget, but has remained tight-lipped about widely speculated-about changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax settings
In a recent media blitz, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has emphasised intergenerational fairness as a key priority in any tax measures to be imposed in this year’s budget
” During an interview on Channel 7’s Sunrise program, co-host Natalie Barr asked Chalmers whether changes to negative gearing and the CGT discount were simply a “cash grab,” given that economists predicted it wouldn’t reduce house prices but would add $30 billion to the budget
Story 2Accountantsdaily•May 3, 2026

Accounting firms advised to look beyond traditional talent for new hires

Signal strongSource-grounded
Source notes [1]Read source

What happened

Some accounting firms are intentionally sourcing non-accounting talent to address recruitment gaps in junior and intermediate roles. Firms cite emotional intelligence and trainability as trade-offs that can be managed with structured onboarding and supervision. This is operationally relevant for buyers seeking alternative near-term capacity without increasing offshore exposure

Buyer takeaway

Treat non-traditional hiring as a real supply alternative and require suppliers to document training, supervision, and competency gates

Cost / money

May lower headline recruitment premiums but increases near-term training and verification costs for buyers

Supplier / commercial

Suppliers offering onshore training/reskilling can command commercial preference and potentially higher fees for guaranteed local delivery

Safety / operations

Increased need for supervision and audit controls to prevent payroll and tax processing errors when role skills differ from traditional qualifications

What to watch

Verify whether suppliers are using this as a long-term pivot or a stop-gap; test sample deliverables before widening scope

Key facts

  • Recruitment of non-accounting candidates for junior/intermediate roles
  • Reported employer emphasis on trainability and emotional intelligence

Source excerpts

One small accounting firm is tapping into the non-accounting talent pool to address its talent shortages and has outlined how other firms can do the same. Firms struggling with finding talent should look beyond the traditional accounting or commerce graduate with non-accounting backgrounds, according to James Scott, principal at JD Scott + Co accountants
One small accounting firm is tapping into the non-accounting talent pool to address its talent shortages and has outlined how other firms can do the same
Firms struggling with finding talent should look beyond the traditional accounting or commerce graduate with non-accounting backgrounds, according to James Scott, principal at JD Scott + Co accountants
Story 3Accountantsdaily

Latest Accounting News - AccountantsDaily

Signal moderateDirectional
Source notes [3]Read source

What happened

Industry tech coverage shows AI is evolving faster than many firms' governance, and vendors are forming partnerships to accelerate product features. The practical implication is rising dependency on supplier-controlled AI outputs and the need for clearer audit and governance clauses. Monitor vendor roadmaps for features that change data flows or third-party dependencies

Buyer takeaway

Require supplier commitments for AI output audit trails and remediation responsibilities before accepting AI-driven deliverables

Cost / money

Absent contractual protections, verification and remediation costs are likely to fall to the buyer when vendor AI outputs are incorrect

Supplier / commercial

Vendors bundling partner features may reduce buyer bargaining power on portability and incident SLAs

Safety / operations

Higher cyber and data integrity exposure due to faster AI rollouts without matching governance increases operational risk

What to watch

Look for RFP/SOW language that narrows vendor liability or makes buyers responsible for validation of AI outputs

Key facts

  • Reported acceleration of AI features and vendor partnerships
  • Industry commentary that governance frameworks lag feature rollouts

Source excerpts

21 April 2026 • By Robyn Tongol Technology AI is evolving faster than many small businesses’ governance frameworks, reinforcing the need for clear, practical
10 April 2026 • By Emma Partis Technology With the first quarter of the year already behind us, here is a recap of all the accounting tech developments you may... 08 April 2026 • By Heather Smith, Anise Consulting Technology The new security feature in the ATO app allows users to confirm if a call from the ATO is genuine rather than from a
Technology Technology What accounting firms are losing while they’re winning

VP Snapshot

Executive Risk & Action View

Accounting firms in Australia are widening hiring pools beyond traditional accounting degrees — this changes sourcing strategies and reduces sole reliance on offshore labour as the only supply lever.

Overall
57
Cost
97
Supply
25
Schedule
38
Compliance
35

Top signals

0-30dcost

Signal 1: Cost / money

Broadening hiring pools can reduce immediate competition for trained accountants and lower premium rates for scarce senior hires, but may increase training and verification costs for buyers.

Signal 5: Supplier / commercial

Pre-budget uncertainty could cause advisory suppliers to delay fixed-fee bidding or to propose narrower scopes with higher contingency clauses for tax work.

30-180dcost

Signal 2: Cost / money

Faster AI feature rollout from vendors can shift verification and remediation costs back to buyers unless contracts specify supplier obligations for auditability and error remediation.

30-180dschedule

Signal 3: Supplier / commercial

Suppliers that offer onshore staffing or reskilling pathways may use that as a differentiator and justify higher per-engagement pricing for guaranteed local delivery.

30-180dcommercial

Signal 4: Supplier / commercial

Platform and software partners pursuing joint AI features create new single-vendor dependencies; negotiating multi-supplier exit or data-portability terms becomes commercially important.

30-180dregulatory

Signal 6: Safety / operations

Bringing non-accounting hires into finance roles increases the need for documented supervision, verified audit trails, and focused training to avoid payroll or compliance errors.

Recommended actions

CategoryDue 3d

Request written hiring and training plans from retained advisory and payroll suppliers showing how they will integrate non-traditional hires or onshore reskilling into delivery...

Confirmed supplier plans that clarify training responsibility and onshore staffing posture

ContractsDue 21d

Update SOW and supplier questionnaire templates to require supplier-provided AI audit trails, remediation commitments, and clear onshore/offshore staffing disclosures.

Revised SOWs and RFP templates that reduce ambiguity on verification and remediation responsibilities

CategoryDue 21d

Survey top payroll and tax advisory suppliers for contingency pricing and scope-change approaches they would take during a budget-driven compliance surge.

Supplier responses that clarify likely pricing posture and lead times for budget-related advisory work

OpsDue 60d

Pilot a sourcing route that combines non-traditional hires with a scaled training and verification playbook and vendor-backed SLA on accuracy for routine accounting tasks.

Validated blended-staffing model with documented training, supervision and SLA verification steps

LegalDue 60d

Negotiate contract clauses that lock in supplier obligations for AI output auditability, incident response times, and remediation cost mechanics where uptime or compliance is cr...

MSA and SOW updates that specify audit trails, remediation responsibility, and acceptable response SLAs

Risk register

RiskTriggerMitigation
Watch for supplier RFP/SOW redlines that narrow liability, add pass-through remediation fees, or require buyer-side verification — these are early indicators suppliers are shifting cost and risk.Watch for supplier RFP/SOW redlines that narrow liability, add pass-through remediation fees, or require buyer-side verification — these are early indicators suppliers are shifting cost and risk.Confirm exposure with category, contracts, and operations before the next supplier commitment.

CM Snapshot

Category Manager Decision Detail

Today's priorities

Request written hiring and training plans from retained advisory and payroll suppliers showing how they will integrate non-traditional hires or onshore reskilling into delivery...

because reported supplier moves toward non-accounting hires change delivery readiness and verification needs, and buyers must confirm who will own training and supervision costs.

Due 3d

high

CM move

Use this as the immediate supplier or contract action to move before the next sourcing gate.

Update SOW and supplier questionnaire templates to require supplier-provided AI audit trails, remediation commitments, and clear onshore/offshore staffing disclosures.

because vendor AI partnerships and faster feature rollouts increase dependency on supplier governance and can transfer verification effort and costs to the buyer unless contract...

Due 21d

high

CM move

Use this as the immediate supplier or contract action to move before the next sourcing gate.

Survey top payroll and tax advisory suppliers for contingency pricing and scope-change approaches they would take during a budget-driven compliance surge.

because pre-budget commentary increases the chance of rapid demand for tax advisory or remediation work and buyers need priced fallback options.

Due 21d

high

CM move

Use this as the immediate supplier or contract action to move before the next sourcing gate.

Pilot a sourcing route that combines non-traditional hires with a scaled training and verification playbook and vendor-backed SLA on accuracy for routine accounting tasks.

because firms are shifting to broader talent pools and buyers should validate whether blended staffing reduces cost without increasing compliance risk.

Due 60d

high

CM move

Use this as the immediate supplier or contract action to move before the next sourcing gate.

Supplier radar

Accountantsdaily

high

Observed supplier signal

Suppliers that offer onshore staffing or reskilling pathways may use that as a differentiator and justify higher per-engagement pricing for guaranteed local delivery.

Commercial implication

Suppliers that offer onshore staffing or reskilling pathways may use that as a differentiator and justify higher per-engagement pricing for guaranteed local delivery.

Next step: Validate the source-backed signal with incumbents and alternates before the next award or pricing decision.

Accountantsdaily

high

Observed supplier signal

Platform and software partners pursuing joint AI features create new single-vendor dependencies; negotiating multi-supplier exit or data-portability terms becomes commercially important.

Commercial implication

Platform and software partners pursuing joint AI features create new single-vendor dependencies; negotiating multi-supplier exit or data-portability terms becomes commercially important.

Next step: Validate the source-backed signal with incumbents and alternates before the next award or pricing decision.

Accountantsdaily

high

Observed supplier signal

Pre-budget uncertainty could cause advisory suppliers to delay fixed-fee bidding or to propose narrower scopes with higher contingency clauses for tax work.

Commercial implication

Pre-budget uncertainty could cause advisory suppliers to delay fixed-fee bidding or to propose narrower scopes with higher contingency clauses for tax work.

Next step: Validate the source-backed signal with incumbents and alternates before the next award or pricing decision.

Negotiation levers

Request written hiring and training plans from retained advisory and payroll suppliers showing how they will integrate non-traditional hires or onshore reskilling into delivery...

When to use: because reported supplier moves toward non-accounting hires change delivery readiness and verification needs, and buyers must confirm who will own training and supervision costs.

Expected outcome: Confirmed supplier plans that clarify training responsibility and onshore staffing posture

Commercial mechanism to carry into the next supplier conversation

Update SOW and supplier questionnaire templates to require supplier-provided AI audit trails, remediation commitments, and clear onshore/offshore staffing disclosures.

When to use: because vendor AI partnerships and faster feature rollouts increase dependency on supplier governance and can transfer verification effort and costs to the buyer unless contract...

Expected outcome: Revised SOWs and RFP templates that reduce ambiguity on verification and remediation responsibilities

Commercial mechanism to carry into the next supplier conversation

Survey top payroll and tax advisory suppliers for contingency pricing and scope-change approaches they would take during a budget-driven compliance surge.

When to use: because pre-budget commentary increases the chance of rapid demand for tax advisory or remediation work and buyers need priced fallback options.

Expected outcome: Supplier responses that clarify likely pricing posture and lead times for budget-related advisory work

Commercial mechanism to carry into the next supplier conversation

Pilot a sourcing route that combines non-traditional hires with a scaled training and verification playbook and vendor-backed SLA on accuracy for routine accounting tasks.

When to use: because firms are shifting to broader talent pools and buyers should validate whether blended staffing reduces cost without increasing compliance risk.

Expected outcome: Validated blended-staffing model with documented training, supervision and SLA verification steps

Commercial mechanism to carry into the next supplier conversation

Talking points

Accounting firms in Australia are widening hiring pools beyond traditional accounting degrees — this changes sourcing strategies and reduces sole reliance on offshore labour as the only supply lever.
Vendors and platforms are accelerating AI partnerships and feature rollouts, increasing dependency on supplier-provided audit trails and platform governance that buyers should contractually require.
Pre-budget commentary from treasury is raising uncertainty about tax policy direction; buyers of payroll and tax advisory should expect possible shifts in advisory demand and compliance scope.
For procurement, the combined signals mean negotiate for clearer SOWs on verification, staffing location (onshore/offshore), and change-order mechanics rather than assuming stable supplier pricing or availability.

Supplier radar

SupplierSignalImplicationNext stepConfidence
AccountantsdailySuppliers that offer onshore staffing or reskilling pathways may use that as a differentiator and justify higher per-engagement pricing for guaranteed local delivery.Suppliers that offer onshore staffing or reskilling pathways may use that as a differentiator and justify higher per-engagement pricing for guaranteed local delivery.Validate the source-backed signal with incumbents and alternates before the next award or pricing decision.high
AccountantsdailyPlatform and software partners pursuing joint AI features create new single-vendor dependencies; negotiating multi-supplier exit or data-portability terms becomes commercially important.Platform and software partners pursuing joint AI features create new single-vendor dependencies; negotiating multi-supplier exit or data-portability terms becomes commercially important.Validate the source-backed signal with incumbents and alternates before the next award or pricing decision.high
AccountantsdailyPre-budget uncertainty could cause advisory suppliers to delay fixed-fee bidding or to propose narrower scopes with higher contingency clauses for tax work.Pre-budget uncertainty could cause advisory suppliers to delay fixed-fee bidding or to propose narrower scopes with higher contingency clauses for tax work.Validate the source-backed signal with incumbents and alternates before the next award or pricing decision.high

Negotiation levers

  • Request written hiring and training plans from retained advisory and payroll suppliers showing how they will integrate non-traditional hires or onshore reskilling into delivery... — because reported supplier moves toward non-accounting hires change delivery readiness and verification needs, and buyers must confirm who will own training and supervision costs. — Confirmed supplier plans that clarify training responsibility and onshore staffing posture

    high confidence

  • Update SOW and supplier questionnaire templates to require supplier-provided AI audit trails, remediation commitments, and clear onshore/offshore staffing disclosures. — because vendor AI partnerships and faster feature rollouts increase dependency on supplier governance and can transfer verification effort and costs to the buyer unless contract... — Revised SOWs and RFP templates that reduce ambiguity on verification and remediation responsibilities

    high confidence

  • Survey top payroll and tax advisory suppliers for contingency pricing and scope-change approaches they would take during a budget-driven compliance surge. — because pre-budget commentary increases the chance of rapid demand for tax advisory or remediation work and buyers need priced fallback options. — Supplier responses that clarify likely pricing posture and lead times for budget-related advisory work

    high confidence

  • Pilot a sourcing route that combines non-traditional hires with a scaled training and verification playbook and vendor-backed SLA on accuracy for routine accounting tasks. — because firms are shifting to broader talent pools and buyers should validate whether blended staffing reduces cost without increasing compliance risk. — Validated blended-staffing model with documented training, supervision and SLA verification steps

    high confidence

What to do / What to watch

What to do now

  • Request written hiring and training plans from retained advisory and payroll suppliers showing how they will integrate non-traditional hires or onshore reskilling into delivery...

    Why: because reported supplier moves toward non-accounting hires change delivery readiness and verification needs, and buyers must confirm who will own training and supervision costs.

    Owner: Category

    Expected outcome: Confirmed supplier plans that clarify training responsibility and onshore staffing posture

    [1]

Next few weeks

  • Update SOW and supplier questionnaire templates to require supplier-provided AI audit trails, remediation commitments, and clear onshore/offshore staffing disclosures.

    Why: because vendor AI partnerships and faster feature rollouts increase dependency on supplier governance and can transfer verification effort and costs to the buyer unless contract...

    Owner: Contracts

    Expected outcome: Revised SOWs and RFP templates that reduce ambiguity on verification and remediation responsibilities

    [3]
  • Survey top payroll and tax advisory suppliers for contingency pricing and scope-change approaches they would take during a budget-driven compliance surge.

    Why: because pre-budget commentary increases the chance of rapid demand for tax advisory or remediation work and buyers need priced fallback options.

    Owner: Category

    Expected outcome: Supplier responses that clarify likely pricing posture and lead times for budget-related advisory work

    [2]

Longer view

  • Pilot a sourcing route that combines non-traditional hires with a scaled training and verification playbook and vendor-backed SLA on accuracy for routine accounting tasks.

    Why: because firms are shifting to broader talent pools and buyers should validate whether blended staffing reduces cost without increasing compliance risk.

    Owner: Ops

    Expected outcome: Validated blended-staffing model with documented training, supervision and SLA verification steps

    [1]
  • Negotiate contract clauses that lock in supplier obligations for AI output auditability, incident response times, and remediation cost mechanics where uptime or compliance is cr...

    Why: because increased AI dependency and partner-led feature builds create execution and audit dependencies that must be allocated contractually to avoid surprise pass-throughs.

    Owner: Legal

    Expected outcome: MSA and SOW updates that specify audit trails, remediation responsibility, and acceptable response SLAs

    [3]

What to watch

  • Watch for supplier RFP/SOW redlines that narrow liability, add pass-through remediation fees, or require buyer-side verification — these are early indicators suppliers are shifting cost and risk
  • Watch for supplier RFP/SOW redlines that narrow liability, add pass-through remediation fees, or require buyer-side verification — these are early indicators suppliers are shifting cost and risk.: Watch for supplier RFP/SOW redlines that narrow liability, add pass-through remediation fees, or require buyer-side verification — these are early indicators suppliers are shifting cost and risk
  • Accounting firms in Australia are widening hiring pools beyond traditional accounting degrees — this changes sourcing strategies and reduces sole reliance on offshore labour as the only supply lever
  • Vendors and platforms are accelerating AI partnerships and feature rollouts, increasing dependency on supplier-provided audit trails and platform governance that buyers should contractually require
  • Pre-budget commentary from treasury is raising uncertainty about tax policy direction; buyers of payroll and tax advisory should expect possible shifts in advisory demand and compliance scope
  • For procurement, the combined signals mean negotiate for clearer SOWs on verification, staffing location (onshore/offshore), and change-order mechanics rather than assuming stable supplier pricing or availability

Market pulse

IndexLatestChangeAs of
Accenture (ACN)345 +0.00 (+0.00%)May 3, 2026, 10:12 PM
ADP (ADP)245 +0.00 (+0.00%)May 3, 2026, 10:12 PM
Robert Half (RHI)72 +0.00 (+0.00%)May 3, 2026, 10:12 PM
S&P 500 (SPX)5,125 pts+0.00 (+0.00%)May 3, 2026, 10:12 PM
  • Robert Half: Talent-market proxy: hiring tightness and wage pressure indicators suggest buyers should explore alternative sourcing and training-backed supplier offers
  • ADP: Payroll and tax services proxy: changing tax-policy commentary raises the probability of advisory demand shifts that affect payroll supplier workloads

Sources

Inline citations jump here. Expand a source to read the excerpt, the AI interpretation, and the original link.

[1] Accounting firms advised to look beyond traditional talent for new hires

accountantsdaily.com.au · May 3, 2026

Expand

AI reading

Some accounting firms are intentionally sourcing non-accounting talent to address recruitment gaps in junior and intermediate roles. Firms cite emotional intelligence and trainability as trade-offs that can be managed with structured onboarding and supervision. This is operationally relevant for buyers seeking alternative near-term capacity without increasing offshore exposure

Buyer takeaway

Treat non-traditional hiring as a real supply alternative and require suppliers to document training, supervision, and competency gates

Cost / money

May lower headline recruitment premiums but increases near-term training and verification costs for buyers

Supplier / commercial

Suppliers offering onshore training/reskilling can command commercial preference and potentially higher fees for guaranteed local delivery

Safety / operations

Increased need for supervision and audit controls to prevent payroll and tax processing errors when role skills differ from traditional qualifications

What to watch

Verify whether suppliers are using this as a long-term pivot or a stop-gap; test sample deliverables before widening scope

Key facts

  • Recruitment of non-accounting candidates for junior/intermediate roles
  • Reported employer emphasis on trainability and emotional intelligence

Source excerpts

One small accounting firm is tapping into the non-accounting talent pool to address its talent shortages and has outlined how other firms can do the same. Firms struggling with finding talent should look beyond the traditional accounting or commerce graduate with non-accounting backgrounds, according to James Scott, principal at JD Scott + Co accountants
One small accounting firm is tapping into the non-accounting talent pool to address its talent shortages and has outlined how other firms can do the same
Firms struggling with finding talent should look beyond the traditional accounting or commerce graduate with non-accounting backgrounds, according to James Scott, principal at JD Scott + Co accountants

Used in this brief

  • Next 72 hours — Request written hiring and training plans from retained advisory and payroll suppliers showing how they will integrate non-traditional hires or onshore reskilling into delivery.... Rationale: because reported supplier moves toward non-accounting hires change delivery readiness and verification needs, and buyers must confirm who will own training and supervision costs.. Owner: Category. KPI: Confirmed supplier plans that clarify training responsibility and onshore staffing posture
  • Next quarter — Pilot a sourcing route that combines non-traditional hires with a scaled training and verification playbook and vendor-backed SLA on accuracy for routine accounting tasks.. Rationale: because firms are shifting to broader talent pools and buyers should validate whether blended staffing reduces cost without increasing compliance risk.. Owner: Ops. KPI: Validated blended-staffing model with documented training, supervision and SLA verification steps
  • New, observable supplier behaviour: accounting firms actively recruiting non-accounting talent as a deliberate sourcing alternative rather than only offshoring (Article 3)
Open original source

[2] Tax takeaways from Chalmers’ pre-budget interview blitz

accountantsdaily.com.au · May 3, 2026

Expand

AI reading

Treasury commentary in the pre-budget media run is signalling priorities but remains non-specific on major tax changes. The public remarks shut down some speculation but leave advisers and payroll buyers uncertain about upcoming compliance demands. Watch for formal budget measures that could trigger a surge in advisory or remediation requests

Buyer takeaway

Treat pre-budget commentary as a demand-uncertainty signal that pushes suppliers to tighten scopes and add contingencies

Cost / money

Suppliers may seek higher per-engagement fees or contingency lines for tax/payroll work given the uncertain policy outcome

Supplier / commercial

Expect narrower bids and change-order language; suppliers could delay fixed-price offers until budget clarity

Safety / operations

Potential for last-minute advisory or remediation work that strains payroll and tax processing unless fallbacks are validated

What to watch

Watch for suppliers adding escape clauses or pass-through pricing tied to regulatory change

Key facts

  • Treasury media appearances ahead of the budget
  • Public statements emphasising intergenerational fairness without detailed policy changes

Source excerpts

In a recent media blitz, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has emphasised intergenerational fairness as a key priority in any tax measures to be imposed in this year’s budget. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has been on a media blitz ahead of the 12 May budget, but has remained tight-lipped about widely speculated-about changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax settings
In a recent media blitz, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has emphasised intergenerational fairness as a key priority in any tax measures to be imposed in this year’s budget
” During an interview on Channel 7’s Sunrise program, co-host Natalie Barr asked Chalmers whether changes to negative gearing and the CGT discount were simply a “cash grab,” given that economists predicted it wouldn’t reduce house prices but would add $30 billion to the budget

Used in this brief

  • Next 2-4 weeks — Survey top payroll and tax advisory suppliers for contingency pricing and scope-change approaches they would take during a budget-driven compliance surge.. Rationale: because pre-budget commentary increases the chance of rapid demand for tax advisory or remediation work and buyers need priced fallback options.. Owner: Category. KPI: Supplier responses that clarify likely pricing posture and lead times for budget-related advisory work
  • Treasury commentary in the pre-budget media run is signalling priorities but remains non-specific on major tax changes. The public remarks shut down some speculation but leave advisers and payroll buyers uncertain about upcoming compliance demands. Watch for formal budget measures that could trigger a surge in advisory or remediation requests
  • Buyer bottom line: until budget measures are published, expect advisory suppliers to price uncertainty into scopes and propose narrower, contingency-heavy engagements
Open original source

[3] Latest Accounting News - AccountantsDaily

accountantsdaily.com.au · n.d.

Expand

AI reading

Industry tech coverage shows AI is evolving faster than many firms' governance, and vendors are forming partnerships to accelerate product features. The practical implication is rising dependency on supplier-controlled AI outputs and the need for clearer audit and governance clauses. Monitor vendor roadmaps for features that change data flows or third-party dependencies

Buyer takeaway

Require supplier commitments for AI output audit trails and remediation responsibilities before accepting AI-driven deliverables

Cost / money

Absent contractual protections, verification and remediation costs are likely to fall to the buyer when vendor AI outputs are incorrect

Supplier / commercial

Vendors bundling partner features may reduce buyer bargaining power on portability and incident SLAs

Safety / operations

Higher cyber and data integrity exposure due to faster AI rollouts without matching governance increases operational risk

What to watch

Look for RFP/SOW language that narrows vendor liability or makes buyers responsible for validation of AI outputs

Key facts

  • Reported acceleration of AI features and vendor partnerships
  • Industry commentary that governance frameworks lag feature rollouts

Source excerpts

21 April 2026 • By Robyn Tongol Technology AI is evolving faster than many small businesses’ governance frameworks, reinforcing the need for clear, practical
10 April 2026 • By Emma Partis Technology With the first quarter of the year already behind us, here is a recap of all the accounting tech developments you may... 08 April 2026 • By Heather Smith, Anise Consulting Technology The new security feature in the ATO app allows users to confirm if a call from the ATO is genuine rather than from a
Technology Technology What accounting firms are losing while they’re winning

Used in this brief

  • Next 2-4 weeks — Update SOW and supplier questionnaire templates to require supplier-provided AI audit trails, remediation commitments, and clear onshore/offshore staffing disclosures.. Rationale: because vendor AI partnerships and faster feature rollouts increase dependency on supplier governance and can transfer verification effort and costs to the buyer unless contract.... Owner: Contracts. KPI: Revised SOWs and RFP templates that reduce ambiguity on verification and remediation responsibilities
  • Next quarter — Negotiate contract clauses that lock in supplier obligations for AI output auditability, incident response times, and remediation cost mechanics where uptime or compliance is cr.... Rationale: because increased AI dependency and partner-led feature builds create execution and audit dependencies that must be allocated contractually to avoid surprise pass-throughs.. Owner: Legal. KPI: MSA and SOW updates that specify audit trails, remediation responsibility, and acceptable response SLAs
  • Watch for supplier RFP/SOW redlines that narrow liability, add pass-through remediation fees, or require buyer-side verification — these are early indicators suppliers are shifting cost and risk
Open original source

[4] Robert Half

finance.yahoo.com · n.d.

Expand
Open original source

[5] ADP

finance.yahoo.com · n.d.

Expand
Open original source
More from Professional Services & HRBack to Executive View