Employment Law & Compliance SHRM
What happened
SHRM’s employment law and compliance pages call out the DOL proposed joint‑employer rule, making regulatory change part of the HR compliance conversation. The page notes the DOL proposal and related compliance implications publicly, so suppliers can cite it when arguing for contract-term changes. Watch whether suppliers start referencing this proposal in bids or renewal discussions as justification for escalators or revised liability allocation
Buyer takeaway
Treat the DOL mention as a real negotiation lever suppliers can use; predefine how regulatory shifts affect price and liability in contracts
Cost / money
Regulatory uncertainty gives suppliers a plausible rationale to ask for broader escalators or pass‑throughs, increasing buyer cost exposure directionally
Supplier / commercial
Expect suppliers to shorten quote validity or add one‑way pass‑through wording while citing compliance risk as justification
Safety / operations
Joint‑employer language heightens responsibility for vendor HR and safety processes; operational acceptance criteria should be explicit
What to watch
Watch for contract submissions or renewal letters that reference the DOL proposal to justify term changes
Key facts
- DOL proposed joint‑employer rule referenced on SHRM compliance pages
- SHRM frames compliance and training as central HR obligations
Source excerpts
The latest news and legal updates from the Golden State, along with access to SHRM's industry-leading SHRM California Law HR Specialty Credential
ESG, Ethics & Compliance Advancing organizational responsibility through sustainable practices, ethical leadership, and compliance with labor and employment laws
SHRM membership provides compliance tools, legal updates, and guidance you won’t find anywhere else
